RE:RE:RE:New interview is availableIn my opinion the company that considered pursuing this potential resource previously concluded that the risk/reward was not favorable. Am I to believe that their own geologists missed this "major" fault that is in the immediate vicinity of the old placer field? George's hyperbole of The Great Beauce aside there is no such thing. At this time there is no resource measured or even inferred or indicated. For Management to discuss for at least 2 years that they were going to spinout out the gold claims and only recently Patrick states they had to receive these many permissions from property owners before responsibly moving forward was irresponsible by management imo. But lack of transparency has been the theme here. Cheers, Nap
up2005 wrote: Would like some other peoples feedback. I did not come away feeling warm and fussy after that interview. This gold project has some many moving parts all I can see is PROBLEMS down the road as they try to spinoff this project. $$$ could be tide up for months or even a year before positive SP movement is made. I could be wrong but so many other companies to invest in with a much tighter timeline for SP appreciation.