RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:People will continue to sell First of all everything is at the mercy of PYR engineering team. The guidance was obviously given by PYR and obviously things get delayed. PLUS you heard of covid and the world turned almost upside down with isolation, travel restrictions etc.... IF I thought Bernard was as dishonest as you make him to be - I would not be a shareholder..period.
I can only wish I was Bernard. I have been a long term investor in not only HPQ and PYR but many others as well but one thing I would NOT do is soft bash, post FUD while it is been short attacked. Why would I post stuff against my own investment under the guise of legitmate concern when there is a real short misleading bash campaign going on? Unless I was either demented OR part of the bash team.
I remain long and strong HPQ! Those who are also long and lack patience...think long and hard if you want to be on the sidelines when QRR and NSiR gets unveiled to the world.
Oden6570 wrote:
developbc wrote: Calling the CEO dishonest, credibility issues etc. etc. and at the same time trying to acquire shares. Interesting.
Oden6570 wrote: developbc wrote: Says the one who is trying to acquire more shares..stated just yesterday :
"I had my order filled today and have begun a long term hold and aquisition strategy. I will continue to aquire HPQ shares until such time as our process is mature expanding and revenues realized". - Oden6570
Oden6570 wrote: CancerSlayer wrote: developbc wrote:
"Profitable??!??? They are building and proving out tech and engineering that can and will be world changing disruptive.
Ever heard of latent value and upside potential?"
Agree with BlueMetal75...I've been a staunch supporter until recently, & my concerns have nothing to do with the tech. There certainly is value in latent/upside potential, & I clearly understand the importance of exercising patience. However, one's perception of latent value gets significantly eroded when leadership makes one too many lofty/unfulfilled promises while concurrently trivializing the importance of future revenue potential. Responsible mgmt. doesn't operate in this fashion or make public disclosures to loyal investors in what turned out to be significantly unreasonable/unrealistic timelines...imo. I continue to hold a core position because of the tech, but any heightened confidence I once had in the company's upside potential has taken a serious blow & now needs to be "re-earned"...only time & hopefully more astute/transparent leadership will tell. Hopefully, we can get a little stocking filler before Christmas...but I had the same hope around this time last year.
I completely agree about your concern with HPQ leadership ! One tall unfulfilled timeline after another. The current CEO has created for himself a credibility issue. I am more concentrated on what PYR is saying and doing on our behalf and I no longer watch or listen to Bernie on Agoracom as it usually consists of Bernard being less than honest IMHO with shareholders in regards to timelines.
Your point is ? I believe in PYR and despite Bernard and timelines I believe in the tech , with PYR finally starting commissioning time was right for me to take a position again.
Credibility issue ? Yes ? Purevap completion just around the corner ( 2 years ago ) Nano samples sent to customers by xmas ( last year ) Samples sent to Appollon will only take a week or 2 to know if it works ( last year ) . I stated that Bernard was " less than honest " IMHO with stating theses timelines !. Did all of the above actually happen when he said it would. NO NO NO . So while you are Ok with this as your pom pom's are in action daily on this board others may have different opinions of any CEO whom has a pattern and track record of overpromising and underdelivering. Call it exuberance or excitement on Bernard's part perhaps, however with regards to timelines credibility is most certainly an issue. Developbc are you in fact Bernard ? Curious how you seem to attack anyone whom has legitimate concerns.