HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s): HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the three pillars: becoming a green low-cost (Capex and Opex) manufacturer of Fumed Silica using the Fumed Silica Reactor, a proprietary technology owned by HPQ being developed for HPQ by PyroGenesis; becoming a producer of silicon-based anode materials for battery applications with the assistance of Novacium SAS, and Novacium SAS is engaged in developing a low carbon, chemical base on demand and high-pressure autonomous hydrogen production system. The Company operates in a single operating segment, segment, being the sector of the transformation of quartz into silicon materials and derivative products.

TSXV:HPQ - Post by User

HPQ Silicon Inc > Interesting post about Tesla's probable interest in HPQ

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by BCONTVentureson Mar 22, 2024 6:38pm

141 Views

Post# 35948268

RE:RE:Interesting post about Tesla's probable interest in HPQ

Well said Thinkbigsti69 and completely agree!

Thinkbigsti69 wrote:
Thinkbigsti69 wrote:
Magbeach2 responding to well knowned fudster Whodat780

Please do not interface with me going forward - nor read my posts. I will do so likewise. I do not like your agenda (clearly you have one as you post nothing but FUD on both the PYR and HPQ boards) nor how you interface with others.

As for Telsa or any other battery players, HPQ solution would appear to apply as a drop in solution to any in the space that use graphite as an anode. Telsa, but all accounts, probably uses silicon in a simlar fashion to what HPQ is doing (10%...and increasing percentages in the future). They have alluded to such. Further, HPQ has patents for improving their silicon which they have not yet used in their present battery makeup - with improvements to follow given that this is their first iteration. Long and short, HPQ would have a cost advantage (with the QRR), and an onshoring advantage, to name two. If you were Tesla, would you not take notice of this on any level? or would you just ignore these - especially the green / onshoring aspects. Otherwise, you would be locked out of certain government incentives going forward and possibly face penalties. Good business practice would call for some level of review on their part of this and other factors. I am not stating any of this is a certainty and it is conjecture on my part - it is all about execution and other factors that play out moving forward. A cost advantage would also be front and center in addition to the onshoring / reshoring advantage. Please explain how these would not be a consideration to any company operating in this space?
My last post to you. Using your same logic, Amazon would not exist. It was started in a garage up against the largest players on the planet - but yet they turned the tables because they had disruptive advantages with respect to technology, process, and overall doing something fundamentally different than others (they were not deemed peers for years). HPQ has the potential for disruptive advantage with respect to Fumed Silica, and purificaiton of Silcon from Quartz via the QRR...and optimization of silcon in the use of batteries via Novacium (this advantage is sill being proved out). If you can't see that, than please move on...why would you stick around if you do not believe in the company on any level?