RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Another response from BorisPlease recognise that in relation to 'halts' often the companies involved are not in any rush to come back to market. Why in Stans case would they? Coming back to trading in exactly the same situation as they left a year ago makes no sense for their management, or really shareholders; the same pent up frustrations, except now multiplied!
What news would energise their sp?
Again, IMO, maybe if they intend to reverse merger out into an entity which might bring a little life back into a stock; one with a new focus, likely under new management although (at least initially), still under the 'old' company name.
But even here there is not going to be any rush (e.g., if its a micro private gold then the metal is probably on a long move upwards with all the financial problems the globe is facing; time to make any reverse move in this sector). Further, any serious critical metals company in CAD is not joining Stans as such entities are already probably on the trading 'playing field'. Its not even out of the question that some financial entity e.g. real estate holdings, etc. might want acess to the market and Stans goes in a very different direction (may need a shareholder vote - better than bankruptcy?).
As to the OSC or the TSX compliance dept, there is absolutley no rush for these groups. They deal with 100s of micro/small cap companies over time. Many of these entities often have documentary issues that need to be addressed when they are put under the investigatory fine miicrscope. So, again, there is no rush for the investigators who are have no responsibility to the company or shareholders, other than getting compliance to basic trading requirements.
All shareholders and interested parties can really do is wait (and kill time speculating like the above)
GLTA -
https://twitter.com/EarthsRare