Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum International Bio Recovery Corporation V.IBR

TSXV:IBR - Post Discussion

International Bio Recovery Corporation > Licence agreement with COI
View:
Post by spacespot501 on Feb 01, 2009 2:46am

Licence agreement with COI

I'm curious to see what Converted Organics will do about their licence agreement with IBR. If they don't start production soon (FEB09) using the EATAD technology then IBR has the right to terminate the licence agreement. It's clear that COI would like to try their own HTLC technology to create solid fertilizer, but they'll have to spend millions more to upgrade their New Jersey plant to do so! Huge EATAD digesters are already in place and ready to work but they remain idle. I think that maybe COI thought that IBR would go into receivership and that they wouldn't have to pay the 9% royalties. Or that maybe they could aquire the rights to the technology and patents on the cheap!

The bluff doesn't seem to be the best course of action anymore. With a new deal in California and the people in Ireland moving forward, IBR looks like a survivor for now. A bit more cash and we'll be able to flex some legal muscle on COI. After all, their whole game plan was based on EATAD technology wasn't it? And wasn't the Rhode Island plant also approved based on EATAD? We should terminate the licence agreement COI and sell the rights to that part of the states to a competitor to COI. Time will tell.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities