Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Intchains Group Ltd V.ICG


Primary Symbol: ICG

Intchains Group Ltd is a China-based provider of integrated solutions consisting of high-performance application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips and ancillary software and hardware for blockchain applications. The Company has built a proprietary technology platform named Xihe Platform, which allows to develop ASIC chips.


NDAQ:ICG - Post by User

Comment by BASTILLEDAY4Uon Sep 04, 2016 7:02pm
187 Views
Post# 25207126

RE:The Maven Bought Into Integra

RE:The Maven Bought Into Integra
BASTILLEDAY4U wrote:
From her own well written article, "I bought into ICG in December because the story at that point made good sense". But, this phrase can have a couple different meanings. 1: The Maven bought into the story or 2: The Maven bought into the stock.


I just noticed the "at that point made good sense" part of her comments. Does this mean, this story made sense in December but does not make sense now? Trying to comprehend this part of the article as presented, is difficult. Perhaps a university educated English major on this board can clarify, if there is one.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>