RE: RE: Re-RTO Here is what I think everyone is missing
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc etc etc are platforms that have captive audiences, and have people return for updates, to interact, etc. this increases the time per user, and thus, the value per user
Ortsbois a free chat program, primarily for Facebook. Why would Facebook BUY ortsbo, when essentially, ortsbo has been designed to be be used with Facebook for free. Facebook tried to BUY instagram, and instagram rejected the offer, and we're going to get a financing valuing them at 500+ million minimum. Sofacebook bought them as a defensive move.
Ortsbo can have however many "users", which includes people that just pop on and off. Why has the company never clarified what a "user" is. They just say what Alexa says and google analystics. It's important to have accurate user numbers - having registered users who log in makes a world of difference when valuing social media companies
Something looks to not quite right here with a falling share price, and even the super longs defensive attitudes are starting to soften. Int is running out of money. Ortsbo can't get any startup cash from int, so they need to do a pp right away. How do you finance this without more and more DILLUTION. Eventually, int will not hold 51% of ortsbo, and as ortsbo gets dilluted, so does the value of intertainments holding in ortsbo. Just like your holding in int have been dilluted from 112m to 300m plus shares in a year.
Why would this pattern change