RE: RE: RE: Well, well, well Maybe management could just clarify how they got all the users and where all the users went. I use user lightly with a giggle.
The website rank has fallen dramatically since they stopped pumping money into it. It spiked a bit during the live events, but not to such an extremes as to Move the ranking by 200 000 spots. Something happened and management isn't coming clean on what it is. How does a company report faster growth than Facebook, and how critical user numbers are and how they will monetize the users, and then turn right around and with a straight face say that the user numbers don't matter.
This whole thing stinks. I wish the regulators would actually take a look and the venture companies when they have huge runs and then massive drops. This is exactly what happened with valunet. Exactly the same thing. How can this happen with one CEO over and over and over. And why will int management not issue a press release and clear it up. Maybe because they have moved on to another "idea".
Problem is as a public company they need to keep shareholders informed and int doesn't. It's very difficult to find out any information They bury everything in SEDAR with insufficient breakout in the numbers to figure anything out.