RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: Short position is hugeOh Michael, as expected, not only are you cutting and pasting to change the context of my point, you are assuming ethical values based on the standard set by the perception of a society that the society that you live in has sold to you.
Your comprehension is so miniscule about how the world really works, that I understand why you would be so insecure, simple, and judgemental with your thought process.
My boundaries are not set by external manipulating influences, as most peoples' are. They are set by my own keen sense of awareness, intuition, genuine compassion, love-based self-preservation, and self-realised morals (as opposed to those pushed on to us as a child, created by a fear-based, control-centric society)...
The more you become aware of how sick our society is, the more you realise that you must choose your battles. Living off-the grid, off-the-land, in isolation, is not going to do any good for the planet. But that can easily be deduced as the right thing to do, if you were able to comprehend the world with a magnitude of clarity which you don't have (you should be grateful for your ignorance).
The common saying is that there is a fine line between genius and insanity. The reality is, is that there is a fine line between narcissism, eccentricity, genius and insanity. Only because when you know too much, you realise the paradox of the level of overwhelming choice you actually have (to act, to react, to not react, etc.) and how much we can't actually control.... all the while, trying to cope with the fact that others can't comprehend your level of understanding of things (can be frustrating, which again, affects actions and behaviours)...
How would you choose to live, Michael. If you had any wisdom at all?...