RE:RE:RE:Good news from the USOgopogo26,
Part of your math works. Although, I't clear the angles are somewhat off.
You touched on the angles part of the overall equation when you stated "So if that stake doubles in value, Mason share price should double as well. Whether it will, that's another question . . ."
In speaking to the "lockup period", you also added to why any or all value from the roughly 9% NOU.V equity interest would likely not be immediately and accurately reflected in the LLG.V share price.
Any potentially realized greater LLG.V share price value directly resulting from a sudden and quite aggressive move upward of the NOU.V share price would require the sale of the NOU.V equity asset.
We understand that "holding companies" more often only tend to get paid once the officers and directors of such a "holding company" finally liquidate the asset being held; ergo, the LLG.V share price would invariably not be allowed to reflect the full established value or consequent new value of the asset in question until the asset in question is in fact sold or perhaps until the asset is subject to the newly introduced terms and conditions relating to Mason Resources provisioning an option to purchase the asset in question for a would be designated future purchaser, another "rinse and repeat" manuever, so to speak.
Finally, I would agree with you that should LLG.V shareholders not be once again subjected to experiencing a liquidating of "a primary asset" at a relatively far too discounted and therefore far too low value, e.g. $10 Million instead of the $17 Million+ which the NOU.V equity stakehold had previously been valued at, Mason Resources shareholders could indeed stand to experience an ROI here with LLG.V shares of at least 9% more.
In closing, we agree that the asset in question must be monetized for much more, especially in terms of any would be incoming ca$h only purchase proposal being accepted.
Should this Fahad Al Tamimi and the other degen_rates over at Mason Resources attempt to sell the roughly 9% NOU.V equity asset in exchange for equities issued to Mason Resources by some other company . . . Now that kind of maneuver certainly wouldn't be unexpected of Fahad Al Tamimi & Co.
After all, Mason Resources officers and directors, selfinterested and self dealing persons who are being far too exorbitantly compensated for doing little other than simply collecting their respective undeserved employment relating equities awards and undeserved salaries from "the company", would do aything to keep this "holding company" exactly holding equity portions of other companies, whilst they keep milking dry all the remaining cash and denying we LLG.V equities investors a more than decent ROI.