RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NewpostLet me clear up at least one piece I've read here everyone. Public companies don't form committees and hire advisors (for a fee) for the sake of doing so. Laurion doesn't have hundreds of staffers sitting around looking for projects. If something structural is created and partnerships are formed, it's for a purpose. That doesn't guarantee any outcomes, but it's fair to read Laurion's deal based structures as being formed to review real interest.
Second, I'm not abandoning anything. I'm a massive shareholder and continuing to be so. My registration was planned and so the timeframe I had to offer Laurion had an end date. Simple as that.
Chill everyone, there's a ton of work being done on our behalf to look for more resources (massive recent success), develop the corporation (one great partner after another, years of working capital, oversubscription to shares etc...) and sell the business to a strategic acquiror (stated and restated constantly by LME leadership).
Transparency doesn't get much more transparent than assay results and pre disclosure on directors market activity. There's nothing sharable being kept from shareholders, never has been.
These are the ingredients that make up the recipe for a tremendous outcome. The future is bright in my view. It's absolutely okay if you don't share that view. Your shares are your own and you get to do whatever you think is best with them. Anyone selling shouldn't be villified for making that choice (or having to make that choice). I think it's extremely positive that there was a large, unpredictable sell side demand and it took a day to absorb it. Not many juniors have the ability to do such a thing and Laurion shrugged it off.
Think like a buyer. These are good things.
Hope that helps,
-Steve