RE:RE:RE:IR at MDXrags2rags wrote: Basically we talked about the company in general and lack of info but as he explained, they really cannot go into detail until they have a signed agreement due to a confidentiality. Also you can bet that if info leaked, someone would probably call whoever they were talking to an start asking questions which would not be good.
Apparently there are are many opportunities which are being explored and a few about to close but all take time to close and until things are signed not much can be said. Sounded like we may hear something from them shortly though.
He agreed it has taken longer than anticipated to become profitable but he was very upbeat on the second half of the year. He said all it will take is one good deal.
That's about it. Easy guy to talk to so pick up the phone and call him. There is too much negativity on this board for me, I tend to observe only but am getting tired of reading about same people harping about the same thing. There seems to be a lack of understanding on how fast large corps move on these things. It's not a yard sale, so much planning and due diligence needs to be done before a large
Corp will support using a product like this. We have the goods it's just taking time. First adopter will have a nice advantage but others will follow quickly in my opinion.
Glad the kool-aid was tasty. Hate to rain on the parade re larger companies, but there are no barriers to entry here. They don't need to buy this out. And as to a lack of understanding on how fast they move? It's been how many years of stagnation, dilution, empty promises and "just wait until NEXT quarter" claims. Negativity is just objective realism, here. And anyone new to the story would do well to dive deep and hard into the financials here and the history on non performance. Still no presentation or share information on the website and pitaful insider filings. It's not a yard sale, usually those have some bargains. I would be happy to hear where I am wrong in my perspective, here.