RE: So that's what you are going on about..... So you think that your oversight of the I/R firm representing GRR is nothing along with the 'shock & awe' of previous bump-ups in the s/p. The total B/S you were shoveling about signed confidentiality reports and a NI43-101 as reasons for not having an I/R firm representing GRR are too funny. It must be the high bar bills. Your so called "rants" by me, solely about the exercise of the warrants for a continuing "JOB-WELL DONE" by I/R as the issue, is the furthest thing on my agenda.. GET REAL *ON ! oops 'atticus' What about your 'bub' *AR-oops 'sweatman' and their posting about the I/R firm representing V.CZ per my previous posts?? Wait a minute, no one to date has fielded any of my previous questions let alone the most recent ones LMAO
I posted yesterday it is about YOU and nothing ELSE to your 'bub'. My advice, for what it is worth, would be for you to vacate your position of insolence regarding these matters.