Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Post by langlandon Dec 16, 2010 8:20am
397 Views
Post# 17854425

not included

not includedIt seems to me that hardly any of the old resource was included in this new estimate- hence the 'low' figure. 'Most of the previous drill holes were not completely sampled in all the mineralized zones and that has had a negative effect on the resource. Any unsampled intervals were considered as having a gold assay of 0.0 g/t.' This seems to be the key. The rules are so strict as to what can and cannot be included as a 'resource'.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>