RE:RE:RE:The only hold upInvestorpigs wrote: Casperwy17 wrote: robmiller wrote: I'm starting to see is MRS (the manufacturer)wants too much money per product/item on such a huge contract and/or the distributor wants a bigger cut of the pie so JR is trying to reduce costs and streamline for MRS (hence his hiring) to make all happy, other than that it's a simple USA Gov't hold back because of possible issues with the particular foreign military IMO! Rob
You have no idea what you are talking about, so why continue to embarrass yourself?
I agree. Rob use to post somewhat valuable information. The last week or two he is sounding more and more like choices/checkout. Losing all credibility. I use to look forward to Robs insight, now it’s embarrassing watching him make baseless assumptions. Might be joining his friends on ignore shortly if these garbage posts keep up.
Unless you have some proof to back up those posts Rob? Maybe you just forgot to share the links supporting your theory??
Please post links from MRS stating the following:
1.Link showing the manufacturer is asking for too much money.
2.Link showing the distributor wants a bigger cut of the pie.
3.Link showing this has anything to do with the US government. (Last I heard from the company they said foreign government no domestic (now this may be argued that US would fall under “foreign government” since we are traded on a Canadian market.) my understanding is MRS has yet to disclose what government this is with? Can you please post the Link showing MRS stating this is with US?
4. Please post the Link showing the holdback is because US is having issues with foreign military.
I assume you have facts to back up your claims and aren’t just pulling these theories out of thin air.
i look forward to you clearing up the confusion.