FuelPositive Corp V.NHHH

Moni FTW

[Fibb22]

I've nicknamed green ammonia "Moni" over in my slack room.

As I posted before,"Moni" is a big Fn deal.  If you haven't done it already, google "green ammonia news" and you'll see what I mean.  Some company (or group of companies) is definitely going to make 10s of billions on green ammonia in the coming years.  Green ammonia is pretty much the only way to decarbonize agriculture and long haul shipping.

In the coming weeks and months FP's value proposition will come into better focus.  First we need the TSX to approve the deal with Dincer.  Then we need to see what Dincer's tech is capable of and at what cost.   FP will have to demonstrate how cost effective and scalable it is. 

Meanwhile, tell you're brother in law to keep an eye on NHHH.  Everybody and their dog should already know Moni will be a large and growing industry with great margins.  More on that later. 

[EDMINNEMA]

ok, TSX approval does not take long, as long as there are no issues, as Gordon may be an isuue. Per Dincers tech, shouldnt FP KNOW PRIOR TO DOING A DEAL what the tech is capable of and what the costs are. I should think so

[Fibb22]

Like wow.  Yes, of course FP knows already.  When I said "we" I didn't mean FP.  "We" are not part of FP.  My mates and I, and logically the people that read this bullboard, are shareholders who's are waiting for details on Dincer's tech/process.  As far as cost goes though we know a little bit. More on that later. 

[oilersfan]

Fibb you are very irresponsible with your posts.  Ian Clifford has never had any commercial success with this company.  He has only lined his pockets.  It's been 20 years that Ian Clifford has been working at this and never produced 1 dollar in revenue.  That should be the message to tell your brother in law.   I googled green ammonia news and it said that Ian

[Bluntly]

Wow, it's been 20 years that you are stalking IC? What a creep. 

[Hauser]

Fibb your suffering because your an optimist maybe too optimistic.Unfortunately so far optimistic eestor investors have only had negatives. However you are correct about green amonia being a big deal, who a lot off folks are now chasing. lets hope after all the work and money buried eestor catches one of those waves and it just might. Being an entrepenuer isnt easy.

[Fibb22]

While I'm anxious to see more details on it, I'm optimistic because Dr. Dincer's tech could be top drawer.  He's a world-reknowned ammonia technology expert after all.

[Meimar1]

Exactly Dr. Dincer is definitely an expert. BKK was not an expert. More like second choice. Ian should have known that!

[Eric69]

Dincer deal has beenn approved by TSX .  Need to see cost projections.  They stated in the webinar that they had over 20% cost advantage over Haber-Bosch variations.  If this is true, then this will be a blockbuster deal.  20% savings, plus no CO2 emmissions from the process, plus the ability to have distributed small scale production, then the guys presently in the ammonia

[Fibb22]

The claim was 30% less energy (and associated costs)!

[Eric69]

Even more impressive, but the question is whether it is true.  If it is then this will really  be a blockbuster.  The existing guys in the business will want it either to kill it or will want it as a competitive green advantage.  One of those companies is talking about the need to de-carbonize their process.  I wonder what they really mean by this statement . Production

[schrodingerscat]

"Haber-Bosch variations" is not the same as Haber-Bosch process. your message implies that their method is 20% better than other methods used excluding Haber-Bosch. maybe you could check the info to be sure he/she/they said exactly that.  

[Eric69]

They said 30% in the presentation, and did not presume Haber Bosch.   I was corrected by another contributor, but beoing a Chemical Engineer until I see a energy balance with details, I do not know how accurate this.  You can red it yourself.  It has been posted on the website.  The presentation is designed for investors, not engineers.  There are variations depending

[Eric69]

They said 30% in the presentation, and did not presume Haber Bosch.@ @I was corrected by another contributor, but beoing a Chemical Engineer until I see a energy balance with details, I do not know how accurate this.@ You can red it yourself.@ It has been posted on the website.@ The presentation is designed for investors, not engineers.@ There are variations depending on the feedstockl, but all

[Fibb22]

My understanding is the Dincer process for synthesizing ammonia, as it exists today in the refrigerator sized unit (Phase 1) uses 30% less energy than the industrial/standard HB process.  The FP CEO said that the Phase 2 shipping container sized unit that they are going to build is expecteted to be even more efficient.  That's what I gleen from the webinar transcript as shown here:

[Eric69]

This theoretically works if the elcricity is green as it is for wind, solar or hydro (except if from large flooded areas behind dams)  The word energy is being thrown around, without defining what the evergy is.    Nevertheless if the cost is lower it will be a big winner.  Even if you use coal to generate the electricity it is a bigger.  If you use geen electriciy then as

[Meimar1]

In doing deals, Ian is good, not to say, a loser.

[Eric69]

They have come close on a few in the past.  This venture look good but c an existing management pull it off.  They haev not yet divulged anything close to a business plan, or even a business model.  I cannot see these running a plant, and Dincer is a pure engineer, but has he run anything?.  I think it best to let the Ammonia guys run the business and use this technology to