RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Off Track Question for longsI am with you on this one. Most Corporate CEO's are GROSSLY overpaid. Board governance is focussing on keeping Director out of jail. Most CEO's have little or no "skin in the game". Decent salaries are fine . Options need to be minimum 2 years hold, rather than 3 months. I have no problem with a guy making 70 million per year, when it is msotly on dividends, or long term capital games. But this will never happen. Take Frank Stronach for example. He made $70 million one years but onlt $1,000,000 on salary. I worked for company where the CEO made $600,000, but he owned 40 % of the company with earnings of over $100M , and got his share of dividends. He built that business from nothing, and the company still pays a healthy 5 % dividend. He made the value and shareholders are happy. The gunslinger type CEO comes in with big salary and big options, gambles with shareholder money, has no skin in the game. strips the cash out, wrecks the company, probably illegally sells the stock short, gets fired and gets a big severance. Now, as stated I think Ian Clifford is over paid, but I think this time he has a winner. He was buffaloed by Richard at Eestor, maybe naively since he is photograher, not a physicist, but he is determined. and has saved the company several times. I don't know if he can bring in operating and marketing people with true expertise, but I would not bet against him. I just picked up another 25,000 share at $0.20.