Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum FuelPositive Corp V.NHHH

Alternate Symbol(s):  NHHHF

FuelPositive Corporation is a Canada-based technology company. The Company provides commercially viable and sustainable, cradle to cradle, clean technology solutions, including an on-farm/onsite, containerized Green Ammonia (NH3) production system that eliminates carbon emissions from the production of Green Ammonia. It helps mitigate climate change, addressing unsustainable agricultural... see more

TSXV:NHHH - Post Discussion

FuelPositive Corp > Clear as mud…..
View:
Post by lscfa on Oct 26, 2021 4:00pm

Clear as mud…..

So which is it - 30% less energy to make NH3 or 30% less energy to store hydrogen as Ammonia?  




 

June 2021 investor Presentation

 

"Current estimates for moderate scale production would supply NH3 at approximately 30% less energy required than current ammonia production, with an entirely non-polluting production process."

 

"FuelPositive will produce NH3 at 30% less energy than current methods with an added bonus of significant Carbon Credit value"

 

 

"Uses 30% less energy to make Ammonia than to compress Hydrogen"

Comment by Eric69 on Oct 26, 2021 5:10pm
From a chemistry and thermodynamic point of view it may amount to the same thing.  He is comparing electrical energy MWh vs GJ energy  in the hydrocarbon reforming part of the HB process plus the high pressure process to tmake the NH@ via HB.  But who knows.  No one has seen the stoichiometry or a working model.  It looks like some magic to me.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities