Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nickel 28 Capital Corp V.NKL

Alternate Symbol(s):  CONXF

Nickel 28 Capital Corp. is a Canada-based nickel-cobalt producer through its 8.56% joint-venture interest in the Ramu Nickel-Cobalt Operation located in Papua New Guinea. In addition, the Company manages a portfolio of nickel and cobalt royalties on projects in Canada, Australia and Papua New Guinea, including a 1.75% net smelter return (NSR) royalty on the fully permitted Dumont nickel project... see more

TSXV:NKL - Post Discussion

Nickel 28 Capital Corp > New Press Release - ISS Rejects Pelham's Demand for Wholesale Change at Nickel 28
View:
Comment by ICNick on Jun 01, 2023 7:41am
*Permission to use quotations from the ISS report was neither sought nor obtained. This is what I read in this press release. I wonder if ISS really agrees with this press release. Please note that many quotes are from Milewski and not ISS, and the use of elipses (...) which could be very misleading unless you have the entire text. i am tired of these what looks like manipulations.  Give ...more  
Comment by microcaptt on Jun 01, 2023 10:04am
I totally agree.  It’s pretty hard to believe that ISS could get comfortable with a company like Nickel 28 which was running the company without the required number of board members, not meeting the required amount of times a year, having independent directors that weren’t in fact independent and having that person (which is not independent) serve on the compensation committee which approved ...more