TSXV:NSP.H - Post by User
Comment by
LongTheShortson Feb 25, 2022 7:26pm
43 Views
Post# 34463578
RE:RE:RE:RE:Longtheshorts
RE:RE:RE:RE:LongtheshortsI personally, me, didn't view or read this as what bag cheese was saying ..that's just me ..in bag cheeses defence, I did read him going to efforts to show you what he was saying. not in defence of bag cheese he and you both had insults and that took away from the entire fact base of the exchange.
I think the reason why most people stayed out of this debate is becasue it was obscure. Although bag cheese was factually correct in his math and its a debate that isnt common nor easily explained to someone not looking at it in a dfferent light. If bag cheeses writen word gave the impression he figured someone could lose more than 100%, thats due to poor language or a typo or a missinterpretation ..as when you view his accompanying math, which i just did, it explains he doesnt believe you can lose more than 100%.
Being the case there really isn't much left to argue, there's only two people angry. That's just what I see.