Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum NeutriSci International Inc V.NU.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  NRXCF

NeutriSci International Inc. (NeutriSci) is a Canada-based company, which specializes in the development, formulation, and production of products for its business-to-business (B2B) partners around the globe. The Company is focused on the market development for its nutraceutical products. Its products utilize patented form of Pterostilbene called pTeroPure. pTeroPure Pterostilbene is a form of... see more

TSXV:NU.H - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Edcando on Feb 04, 2022 3:14pm

854,000

On the bid lol. We should hold/start to trend up as some realize that's only $8,500 if all could hit the ask. Some will start chipping away and/or raise their bids. Good news is it's thin on the other side and will thin out even more with any positive momentum. GLTUA
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 04, 2022 3:36pm
That looks like the only posative if at all much as clearly the share price has done nothing after the news release yesterday.
Comment by NEWBIE65 on Feb 04, 2022 4:06pm
i surely hope no one is holding out because of what Ed says. 
Comment by Edcando on Feb 04, 2022 5:10pm
Your point? Meta/Facebook lost 26% on a week on earnings and is still overvalued. I sleep well at night because I don't confuse investing in a company with market share price. There are just as many overvalued ones as there are undervalued ones. We should  have never hit $0.35 that quick on just  reviving an order much like we shouldn't be down here now. 
Comment by Edcando on Feb 04, 2022 7:54pm
I will agree with this, right or wrong, what really moves this is that big Tabletz order.  I can see why. It's not only a big number but it's been so long in the sending . It's just I find it a bit weird that we could have 5-10 releases stating revs from $100-$200k (leading to more orders ) with next to no effect and we go bonkers  on one order before it's sent lol. It ...more  
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 05, 2022 11:05am
While the most recent news should be a positive in terms of the message of continuing and additional sales the issue is a lack of clarity and the dollar values associated with them. Glen in past has said that he doesn't like to release dollar values to protect the details of the sales from competitors. In the short term that is holding the stock back but perhaps in the medium term it works in ...more  
Comment by Edcando on Feb 05, 2022 11:10am
To be accurate it's not Glen. He said, true or not, his B2B partners don't want that.  Again I'm not disputing the lack of clarity at all. I'm just saying the positive momentum here has us fundamentally undervalued at these levels. While I can have empathy for any investor /trader with shorter timelines or different goals, I merely share the reasons I'm not concerned about ...more  
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 07, 2022 10:34am
I don't quite understand why the B2B partners would not want details of of the dollar value made public? If they instead dropped the number of sticks sold, so instead of saying "several thousand 3-tab sticks in three flavours", why not just a shipment of Tabletz worth $100,000 or $150,000? A dollar value of $100,000-150,000 gives our competitors little in the way of details but ...more  
Comment by Edcando on Feb 07, 2022 10:41am
Great question.. The closest I can come to is competitive reasons (knowing exact price point/margins etc?), but I also have no idea lol. Maybe if enough of us ask that question we may get an answer? 
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 07, 2022 1:39pm
If you just say $200,000 in sales to Japan in recent shipment without specifying how many sticks, there is no way of knowing price point or margings. Why don't you ask Glen and while we are at it, ask if he or any of the Board members been buying at current levels? I mean if he is so confident of success then surely the price at this level is a gimme. I would rule out any sort of blackout in ...more  
Comment by CanadianShark on Feb 07, 2022 1:50pm
You don't need to ask Glen in order to find out if any insiders or board members have been buying.  It's publicly available information. Just go to https://ceo.ca/nu and click on Sedi Insider filings, and you can see that information.
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 07, 2022 1:59pm
Right and the point is why not? There isn't any blackout period now or for the past year.
Comment by Edcando on Feb 07, 2022 3:02pm
First one would have to go look and see. If you did that before asking them why ask the question like you did rather than make a point?  Once it's been determined if they have or haven't there could be any number of reasons having nothing to with blackouts etc. For starters I'm unaware of anyone working at NU being a millionaire (maybe Durno is?). Glen makes a very reasonable ...more  
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 07, 2022 4:48pm
I did check and found zip, so I asked it in question form and it also happens to be the "point" Ed... Clearly the average retail Joe has bought and accordingly Glen has said in past (at 15 cents or so) we would do very well with the stock. If that is the case I'm sure poor ol Glen and others on the Board wouldn't have to spend 'milk money' at 5 cents. 100,000 shares at 5 ...more  
Comment by Edcando on Feb 07, 2022 5:00pm
The point Vern is that you're sounding bitter lol. If you checked then you wouldn't have to ask if they had. You'd perhaps ask why they hadn't . And even though you keep asking the same question I'll just keep giving you the same answer. I don't know why the B2B partners don't want that. It also doesn't matter too much because it's very easy to work out ...more  
Comment by VeritasVern on Feb 07, 2022 6:50pm
Thanks for the usual responses Ed. I presented a few questions to those on NU stock house but thanks for stepping up again...  Is 5 cents really undervalued, when annual sales are estimated at $200,000 while the market cap is $9.1 million?   The market wants clear numbers to determine value and not obscure news releases. Glen potenially is alienating most NU investors with unclear ...more  
Comment by Edcando on Feb 07, 2022 9:03pm
I'm unsure what you mean about he usual responses since I've actually been quite polite and even agreed that having that information would be great.  Excuse me if your emotions don't allow you to see that or the strange way you "asked". Again taking us back to your first post you asked IF there's had been any insider buying while later stating that you already knew ...more  
Comment by NEWBIE65 on Feb 07, 2022 12:28pm
Smoke and mirrors. Smoke and mirrors 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities