RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Team??In fact, NXO would be better if instead of reporting a 16million dollar loss, it reports a loss of that $300k in salary you say is (not) earned by the top dude.
A company with zero sales can also adjust to minimize costs....a company generating sales must have operations and a sales team that must be fed...so less room there
But in an absolute sense, NXO is currently a total loser company no self respecting investor should own....a gambler maybe.
But only a gambler in control of the amount of money they are willing to lose. Like a guy who walks into a casino with a "stop loss amount" in mind.
A gambler who refuses to get out of the casino having lost say $500, and grumbles about their losses when they reach $1000 or heaven forbid $20,000 is not a gambler but a self flagelating loser.
Would you not agree with that?
Damn1212 wrote: Barstool
im not sure that makes NXO any better ...
A company that has revenue but a loss can try to adjust to make a profit.
NXO has 0 sales ... LOL
In my Books a company with 0 sales is the lowest of the low in the spectrum.