Nexoptic Technology Corp V.NXO

Geeze Louise

[Damn1212]

Talk about Dissapointment. 

Remember the guys saying Mr Cho will turn the company around ... Ect Ect .... 

My Gosh 

Everyone is jumping ship ... Litterally. 

Cant blame em

[Maxmoe]

You mean literally? Perfect example of how that word must be the most misused word in the dictionary. Literally. Or is there a ship docked somewhere I don't know about? Is it half full or half empty?  Jeez Whiz, Etcetera, et cetera, etc. Disappointment. 

[Roadrunner71]

I don't recall anybody saying that about Mr. Cho. My own take on this NR is that you still need accountants to add up all of the assets (flat lens patent) and then pay off the creditors of what's left. Good luck.

[Damn1212]

Roadrunner  I remember when he Came on board.  The puuumpers were saying ohh MR Cho is proof the company is solid and has sales ...ect ect ect  Well ...Proof is in the pudding as they say. 

[Maxmoe]

Sigh. More gaslighting. There hasn't been a pumper on this name for years. Nobody suggested cho's arrival was proof the company had sales. Makes zero sense. As we all know, there has never been any sales. Accountants don't make sales they count them. Or just count the losses in this case. that you're just making up. Again. I could go for some pudding. Chocolate with swirls of

[Damn1212]

Unfourtunately what I am sayi g is true can easily be found in the archives.  Just like your post on this weeks NR ...you said this proves they are not going under ... At the time the same line of comments were made saying the fact such an experienced person was joining the team was proof of sales to come and sunny days ahead. Well , hes gone now, just like most other people who were

[Maxmoe]

OMG , so funny it must be true. It is easy to check the archives, but that's where the truth ends in your post.  what I actually said.  "I'd speculate that a new cfo and a new auditing firm indicates they are not going broke soon. At least not until y\e results are filed"   now, how that translates to your gaslit interpretation that anyone suggested proof

[Damn1212]

Yes thats correct   I was not reffering to you .