Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oroco Resource Corp V.OCO

Alternate Symbol(s):  ORRCF

Oroco Resource Corp. is a Canadian mineral exploration company focused on the assembly of mineral concessions which make up the Santo Tomas porphyry copper project in Sinaloa State, Mexico. The Santo Tomas project is a copper porphyry deposit defined by 106 diamond drill and reverse circulation drill holes totaling approximately 30,000 m.

TSXV:OCO - Post Discussion

Oroco Resource Corp > A Raise in Q1 2022 is Good; Stop Complaining About Dilution
View:
Post by jwall34 on Dec 15, 2021 3:11pm

A Raise in Q1 2022 is Good; Stop Complaining About Dilution

With Adam hinting at a final raise in Q1 2022, I'm seeing a lot of people whine about further dilution at the current lower market prices.  I'm going to explain why I think that Oroco would be better off raising funds sooner rather than later, and that there really isn't that much of an ultimate difference in the per share buyout price between a 2$ and a 3$ raise.

For illustration, if we assume they raise $30m CAD, using the current 213 million fully diluted share count: 

If the raise occurs @ 2$ / share:

$30m / $2 = 15m shares.  15m / 213m = 7.04% dilution

If the raise occurs @ 3$ / share:

$30m / $3 = 10m shares. 10m / 213m = 4.69% dilution

7.04% - 4.69% = 2.35%

Even a 50% rise in the share price would only reduce the dilution of a $30m raise by 2.35% relative to the overall share count.  

To illustrate how little of a difference this makes, let's assume ST is bought out for $1B USD. They have 85.5% ownership but with the CAD - USD conversion we can estimate it would be worth roughly $1B CAD.

No dilution:

$1B CAD / 213M shares = $4.69 / share

10m share dilution ($3 raise):

$1B CAD / 223M shares = $4.48 / share ($0.21 / share decrease)

15m share dilution (2$ raise):

$1B CAD / 228M shares = $4.39 / share ($0.30 / share decrease) 


At a buyout of $1B USD, Raising at $2 vs $3 only decreases the ultimate per share buyout value by NINE CENTS. (yes, I understand it could go higher, but i'm being conservative for the sake of the example).

In other words, I would MUCH RATHER Oroco raise money sooner than later, ramp up to 5-6 drills sooner, and get a buyout sooner than waiting to hopefully get a higher price and risk running out of money or, worse, seeing the market turn against them and being forced to raise at an even lower price. 

Trust the process.
Comment by Overertune on Dec 15, 2021 6:00pm
If increase to 5-6 holes, how much more work they need to do and do you have a timeline for the buyout? 
Comment by coppermonster on Dec 15, 2021 9:57pm
Yep 100% agree. Get the funds you need to drill this thing out quickly without having to worry about what global economy does and where the copper price is in a few months. I rather have them dilute me by an extra 2% and unlock much more value quicker than keeping dragging along at 3 rigs and hope for a higher share price in Q2.