Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pure Energy Minerals Ltd V.PE

Alternate Symbol(s):  PEMIF

Pure Energy Minerals Limited is a Canada-based lithium resource developer company, which is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company's primary project is the Clayton Valley Project (CV Project), which is located in Clayton Valley, Esmeralda County, Nevada. The CV Project is located in central Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately halfway between Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, United States. The Clayton Valley Project contains an inferred mineral resource of approximately 218,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). In addition, the Company is focused on new processing technologies for lithium through its collaboration with global technology partners, Tenova Advanced Technologies, at the process testing, engineering, and design stage on the Clayton Valley Project. The Company's subsidiaries include 0891884 B.C. Ltd., Esmeralda Minerals, LLC, 1056625 B.C. Ltd., 1061582 B.C. Ltd. and LT Capital Holdings, LLC.


TSXV:PE - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Jun 03, 2020 7:43am
119 Views
Post# 31105303

RHYOLITE - FELDSPAR

RHYOLITE - FELDSPARIn the 2016 tech report we can read that nearby rhyolites contain 228 ppm lithiim. This ppm value 
would align with the lithium brine values with in the clayton aquifers, and, could also explain the lithium in clay values in ( adjacent claims ) which became, concentrated due to less fresh water exposure ( not inline ) with fresh water paths....such as, albermarle or pure energy.

Rhyolites are comprised of, FELDSPARS...aluminum, calcium, potassium and sodium.
So, if the nearby rhyolite ranges erode and end up depositing - in clayton valley, what would be
the potential link in which a, LAB might miss seeinng the lithium values with in the ore or brine samples ?  It, would point to, lithium having a - twin bond, with another, feldspar element.

What's the missing, component which would- liberate a, potential feldspar bond with lithium...?
What is there more of, and less of in the upper strata of basin ores ?
= CHLORIDE.

There is far-more ( FRESH WATER )in upper strata or aquifers... than there is ( CHLORIDE )
Whereas....freshwater can't liberate the ( suspect ) lithium bond, that might be occuring.
If NO CHLORIDE in upper brinnes...then, chances are, the lithium will be missed by, labs.
On the flip side...lithium begins showing uup, when chloride values increase,  in lower, aqiifers.
Coincidence ? ( i think not ) 

SOLUTION ? 
Add chloride to the upper strata aqiifers...to see if the lithium in freshwater horizons liberate the
lithium. Open up the plugged cv holes, agitate the upper strata, and ollect the brines, add chloride.
If the lithium shows up...it will certainly change the dynamics of this, lithium brine project.

If rhyolites contain, lithium in nearby ranges...and if seasonal rains carry, it into basin, and if
the, basin has sedimemts + clays to trap, it's highly probable the ( lithium ) is still there, in near samecvalue ppm's  same, as, rhyolite ranges...simply, check the feldspar group of mimerals, calciim, aliminim, potassium, sodiim, for the lithium in a bond...or, even on its own...in freeform, in csrbonate that may have been missed by the lab...which may have been too narrow in thier seaarch, looking for lithium chloride.

Again, the lithium may have formed a, bond, or could be in a, carbonate form, which is more resistent to solubilizing....adding chloride to the resampled upper aquifer - brines...  just, might
REVEAL HIDDEN LITHIUM.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>