Post by
Wangotango67 on Jun 05, 2020 10:01am
ALL THE WHY's
- Why didn't PE update pea, and resources before cracking a deal with, Schlumberger ?
- Why is the pilot plant for simple brines costing ($15/$25/mil ? ) cyp's $6.75/mil for clays ( harder )
- Why let the price slide, for so long then, crack a deal ?
- Why didn't cyp address their water needs for thier - clays ?
- Didn't cyp perform a 1,000+ ppm clay sample with, Noram Eng. ( why only 300ppm feed ? )
- Why did cyp, send clay samples to butte momtana imstead of, directly to, Noram...?
one would think noram would, look after the entire clay extraction, right ?
- Did butte montana only send noram - brine feed stock ?
- Could this feedstock be - BRINES from the, clays ?
- Can an acid plant be, set up on an, aquifer basin, with epa approval ?
- Why only lithiuum reserves accounted for, in cyp's pfs - why not more = depth - change to dig ?
- Has cyp secured a permit in order, to dig a basin watershed ?
- Will cyp drill own claims for water to mine ?
- If they ever did...could the project, turn, to brine mining, if lithiim brines are apparent ?
- Will speriment, soon drill a deep drill / hole 1/2 mile from PE + Schlumberger ?
- CYP has few shaares out.., they still need to attract larger interest to move to, pilot plant.
- With, few shares, a supposed 6 momths needed to build pilot/plant = more time for another to
scoop cheapies... the longer these clayton - projrcts take - easier for, larger player
-
What's really going, on in, Clayton ?
Why has, each junior dragged thier projects ?
Why, so many ressistent points and, always more time needed ?
Would this not facilitate another to walk in on the cheap ?
AGAIN...
- Should PE have updated thier pea + resource before, cracking a deal ?
- Why drag a project, perform no unpdates, craack a deal, then prez steps down ?
- Should PE have been given a higher % ?
- Who will step forward for cyp to, assist, them ?
- Will an entirely, different interest do, so...other than, whose been revesled so far, in clayton ?
- What if it's the same entity...and same entity provides the $6,75/mil to cyp, for, same - pilot plant ?
- Why is Noram engineering apart of PE's exrraction and, cyps ?
- WHY DID CYP SEND THIER, CLAYS TO MONTANA THEN, THE REMNANT OF FEEDSTOCK WAS
SHIPPED TO, NORAM - WAS THIS A LEACHED BRINE SLURRY - ?
- IF MONTANA PERFORMED A - LEACHATE FROM CLAYS ( ? )
- WHAT IF CYP'S ( FEEDSTOCK, ) IS THE SAME PILOT, PLANT AS, PURE ENERGY'S ?
- COULD IT MEAN...CYP'S $6.75/MIL COST - WOULD, BE FOR WHAT ???
- TRANSLATE TO - $6.75/mil/worth/shares @ $.20/cents = 33.75 million / shares
- IF NO SHARES...THEN, WHAT, %;OF ROYALTY...?
- BETTER YET...IF SAME PILOT PLANT - THEN...WHY $6.75/MIL ?
- IS IT, RIGHT... PE DIDN'T...UPDATE THIER....
PEA + RESOURCE BEFORE CRACKING A DEAL ?
3%:??? All eyes, on...cyp....what will thier's be ?
- HOW IS IT PE'S PILOT PLANT COSTS FAR MORE ( $15-$25/MIL )
- VS - CYP'S WHO HAS CLAY, PROCESSING - CLAYS REQUIRES MORE ATTENTION...
you, know...send to montana then, off to...noram...wink.
- WHY....IS IT TAKING PE SO LONG FOR A BRINE, PLANT ?
- WAS THIS NOT ALREADY...PERFORMED. - YEARS AGO...?
- A SIMPLE DESALINATION OR DISTILLATION SIMILAR TO, ALBERMARLE'S - SUN EVAPORATION
BUT IN A PLANT EXRRACTION MODEL....WOULD RENDER RESULTS...
WHY NO UPDATE, ON THIS...?
- Would be nice to see a royalty % revision based, on...
new cv 9 hole - and all other cv holes...yes...
new brine analysis for all holes with acid to test for additional lithium values
revised pea
inclusion of nevada energy/advantages - brine hole - resources
factor - in the above - then, a new royalty...
Speculative post...