Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lucero Energy Corp Com V.PSH


Primary Symbol: PSHIF

PetroShale Inc is an independent oil company focused on the acquisition, development, and production of oil-weighted assets in the Bakken and Three Forks formations in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota.


OTCQB:PSHIF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by metzgfon May 11, 2005 10:06pm
104 Views
Post# 9022888

From the other board

From the other boardBy: markrhead 11 May 2005, 08:29 PM EDT Msg. 1130 of 1130 Jump to msg. # I talked to Mr Cotter at length. The 20 million shares he says was for the 10% TX project in private placement. Brian was offered a seat on the board but refused without being given liability insurance. Said none of them have it because too expensive. David Ashby is an attorney who is not up to speed on the Oil & Gas business or PRRPF from what I got after talking with him who is up for a board seat. I don't think he owns any shares as he is new. The third board member, Neil Iverson, only has shares thru options granted, never buying in himself in the open market. They are requesting a couple of O&G people (maybe from McAlister) to be on the board, but they are waiting on the results of TX before accepting depending on results. From what I gather of the board, only Mr Cotter has a vested interest in PRRPF by putting his money where his mouth is. I want board members that are stockholders, and I don't mean by way of options granted for filling a seat at a meeting. Cotter seems like an honest guy and is also frustrated, but maybe a shakeup would be advantagous. Hannah having oversold the Alberta property cannot be fired as he is the partner in MI, which is screwed up as well. Seems like he should be held liable or something!
Bullboard Posts