Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Post by hegemonicoblivionon Aug 16, 2013 12:18pm
170 Views
Post# 21676431

Rsh... disagree on your dividend reasoning on a few fronts.

Rsh... disagree on your dividend reasoning on a few fronts.First and foremost is that by 2014, we should be a very reasonably sized junior, and if you do your research on which other companies are paying a dividend, you will see my rationale is not far fetched.  Reverse stock splits almost always cause pain in terms of the price after the RB versus the price  pre roll back, so Im again any idea of a rollback. I dont believe it will attract the amount of new investors versus simply installing a dividend, and bringing that type in our radar. And by the way, dividends are not a way of money, they are a return of capital to the owners of the company. 

Take a look at some of the few oils in Columbia (outside of PRE) and then tell me about their institutional ownership. We already have some of that here, simply check out the appropriate 
databases.. Time brings risk... and every investor has their own time frame for what they want to
do with their shares and on what particular terms.... Sure a take out might happen, then again, perhaps it might not.... No one counts on that, but it might be a nice surprise if it did.... DIvidends coupled with improving RLI and conservativism (to a reasonable degree) should serve us very
well, no matter what your time frame... Have a nice day.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>