RE:RE:RE:P2-redact redux....really nowblissisback wrote:
This was great, I would have been banned within seconds if I said this too FJ, but it is soooooo true, LOL!!! "FJ, with all due respect, you haven't been correct about a single thing in how long now? You post these definitive posts that get all the readers on the board here excited by singling out words from articles and going off on a tangent with it. Or my favorite is that you "heard rumblings from deep-pocketed investors" or "your source told you this and that" and then nothing ever checks out. Whenever someone asks for you to prove something you state you don't have to. You just made this statement: "We've been scaling to 100nm for likely months now". Clearly you can't read english. Dr. Taylor stated that he has scaled to 100nm NOT we are scaling to 100nm. I don't even know what to say about what you just wrote. It's common to say "we" when investing in something or for a sports team for example. Example with hockey "We need to win tonight" or "We had a great year". Am I playing for the team or part of POET, no. It's just something everyone says. You pointing that out and using it as a basis for your argument... really? Taylor is POET. If Taylor scaled to 100nm then POET has scaled to a 100nm. Doesn't mean MS8. Also me stating that "We scaled to 100nm" just means that POET has scaled to 100nm."
.....and that is why I basically keep what I know and what I get to myself....in doing so many of the poor saps who think they know this game......lose out....bear in my kind also that the clown who wrote that does not produce much of anything either......except a ton of carbon dioxide