RE:RE:RE:RE:I thought someone said da Pooet is guudd?I understand when you and maestro exercise your warrants that you buy Poet for 52 cents. I get that, doubledufus. But you and maestro are traders too, so you sell shares to pocket a beautiful profit. Then the new "real" long shareholders become the more desired shareholders that have raised the baseline price of Poet to a higher low (what the new investors have bought). The buy and hold shareholders are healthier for a growing company in the long run. So your trades are strengthening Poet, right?
So the real question is why is/was it necessary for the two of you, as probable warrant holders (maestro already admiteed to that), to have bashed Poet so hard and were unfairly negative and outrageous toward Poet management with unfair comments, some of which unfairly painted their image as incompetent management, this company is going to go bankrupt, yadda, yadda, yadda, according to you both? You are supposed to be supportive long shareholders. But how would Poet feel about the years of unfair comments you both made about them? What was your motivation behind those comments? Does it or did it ever have anything to do with sentiment before you made any of your trades? ewe sea.
goobar-roc