RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Now That’s Truly Funny! Thanks WinterSun, obviously I have some things to learn around here. Is this correct? Am I able to fix this after the fact?
wintersun10 wrote: you are supposed to click "quote" so everybody knows who you are responding to
and then put your mouse on top of the quote, so your reply looks like this.
MisterWoo wrote: OK, I'll bite. Please elaborate on the claims you are making:
The POET technology is only partially proven
They have only managed to produce crude lab samples
Management admits they've had problems building samples for legacy 100/200G technologies.
Where would I find factual information to support any of these statements you've made? Otherwise, they should be considered an unimformed opinion, or worse, purposefully deceptive or inaccurate in order to discredit the company or its technology.
When providing the relevant information, please include direct links to statements the company has made to support your comments so we can see for ourselves. Example, the company has indicated they have produced both alpha and beta samples for customers. In the semi world, i believe it is generally accepted that alpha and beta sampling means they have moved well past "crude lab samples". What information do you have that makes you think otherwise?
looking forward to your highly informed response!