RE:RE:RE:RE:Pennyf just jumped the sharksorry i did not know you were so sensitive.
next time i will use kits gloves in case you are not on ignore yet.
longpoet wrote: So what keeps you long POET? You didn't answer before. You just insulted me instead.
wintersun10 wrote: this is a prime example of posts that gets the poster on my ignore list.
pointless replies to pointless posters
argueing with posters that have gone over the edge
we have the ignore to use it.
and no this is not defamation, this is not bullying, this is just letting you know what experience has taught us(long time users of SH)
longpoet wrote: When I saw he had posted about GaAs, I had to do a double take. This bunch on here calling us names and discrediting POET and then post that POET's GaAs tech in not commercially viable. I am stunned at the unbelievable ignorance. These posters are the epitome of misinformation and misrepresentation. Talk about living in the past. Criticizing a company about a technology that the shelved 5 years ago? WUT? ROTFLMAO
Mackwheaton wrote: Killed any credibility he might have had with his latest post, where he said,
3) The underlying GaAs tech isn't commercially viable and too difficult to produce anything in a high yield low cost process"
GaAs technology!? Where have you been penny? GaAs technology was scuttled 5 years ago for the Optical Interposer, which is indeed a high yield platform (>400 chipsets per wafer) at a fraction of the cost of current bench assembly techniques. Poet has not spent a dime on GaAs.
You just tore up your bashing card penny, zero cred in those statements. Lies and disinformation have no place on a stock chat board.