RE:RE:Claims to have never Traded this Stock. Is that true?In the your historical archive posts, do you remember bragging about bringing me over to here? Was that disinformation? Then what followed? More nonsense, right?
You can post whatever you want and I don't care as long as it's not about me. Just leave me out of what seems like manufactured drama, OK? And calm those secondary posters that join you in the nonsense, pretty please?
Bottom line is, hopefully, we all want Poet to succeed.
gilver
maestrodrumboe wrote: Giver,maybe its come time to get over it.Short or long you should respect them all and size should not matter.lol.
It's still not to late to admit you were dead wrong as it has now become abundantly clear that the down to earth folks were 100% right all along.Now wether Poet pulls out of this mess,or not, it remains to be seen.I believe that Most posters on this forum own shares(some more,some less) that are mostly deep in the red, including me,.but I have never been in love with the stock and was able to benefit from profits through trades, which more than offset my current paper loss.To this day I still consider POET to be a pre-revenue stock,stuck in R&D stage.
I have no issue with longs or shorts or flippers or traders,all the Glory to them.. At the end of the day, we all invest with high hopes to make a buck..but I do have a little problem with dishonest pumpers who wittingly choose to spread disinformation throughout these stock forums.
BTW..I have nothing to hide and as have always said and happy to admit that I have traded the stock successfully many times,going back years.
to each their own,,EH?..