RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:What a big player can doWhat I believe, but don't know, Malricy, is that the Board holds the belief in Reulet's invention having merit.
What I believe, but do not absolutely know is: either there was not a deal to be had that was palatable for shareholders or that, once the Board saw the deal in front of them - backed off and out which complicated JCP's 'life' expectancy.
What I believe, but do not know, is that the IDQ/SK deal is an outlier (to date). SK had the forward vision to invest in a private company that now allows them to say that they are the first in the marketplace to provide this level of security for their smartphone customers. Good on them! Smart on them! What this exposure might do is propel others forward. SK/IDQ is actually lobbying for tighter mandated security which, of course works for them, but also works for QNC.
Need that CMOS chip and actual work on that might not progress unit the unversities are in session imo.
Malricy wrote: AbNormal, welcome back. I'm sure I speak for many when I say WE MISSED YOU.
NOW... if IDQuantique can get Samsung to implement their teck in a phone QNC can get some company on board. That's all we need here people.... that's it, one company that's says we tried the cmos prototype, we liked it and we are using it in our product. MANAGEMENT, can you answer if this is possible....