RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:How come Quintessence Labs is not part of QeM competing tech I am not a physicist or a famer...
I am a dirt farmer that likes numbers and was good at math and sciences in school. Not sure what to think of thenQuintessence Labs thing, but here was a link I shared on the QNC back in 2019.
https://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=Quantum+Numbers+Corp&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PG01
Hit number 2... it mentions quantum tunnelling by using conductors...
I do remember that the US patents were easier to obtain than than the European ones... the patent approver was stuck on a small process that eventually B. Reulet was able to get clarified and eventual approval in Europe
To note, I have done zero DD in the patent agency websites on Quintessence to see if they have actual patents.
Gotta run here, busy time of year with lots going on
FI4
luckyluc wrote: Well by reading this article it looks like they are using electron tunneling which is the exact same thing as QeM patents unless I am wrong. If this is indeed true, These patents adds A LOT not to say HUGE value to QeM since anyone else wanting to use electron tunneling will violate their patents. Maybe our physisis/Famer can validate this ? Sometime a little tiny difference in their implementation can make them unique, they are saying they use a Diode, perhaps QeM is using another electronic component ???