Post by
judomacca on Mar 04, 2021 1:54pm
Went to the Horses mouth
Since there were so many rumours flying around and a stock halt this morning, I drcided to call RECO up. This is no problem since I live near Vancouver, the heart of Howe Street Stock Scams.
The lady was very nice but wouldn't give out any info, but did say she is a big holder of stock and continues to hold. She said at the outset the venture was to find a permian system and that idea was more speculative than it is now. Whatever that means.
She says the idea of drill, find oil and mine it is not what they are looking to do. They want to prove up an extensive Permian-type basin and will not be releasing results until they have finished their 3 well exploration and seismic operation.
At the same time they are taking longer than forecast due to extensive sampling
Their plan is to finally drill up to 10 water wekks for the local population
Comment by
teheran10 on Mar 04, 2021 2:06pm
They will be sued if they had material info and did not release. They might not know the market law than. Someone send them email maybe. I have already done that.
Comment by
TurnToTheRight on Mar 04, 2021 5:44pm
Jay Park is a Canadian lawyer with substantial experience... they know the law.
Comment by
ReConAfr on Mar 04, 2021 6:02pm
Jay Park was accused of bribery in Somalia and Chad... this whole thing is dodgy... at first it was all about unconventional, then it's conventional... call the UK number for ReconAfrica and you reach Jay Park Energy... the office in London is just a front... its all running on fumes
Comment by
TurnToTheRight on Mar 04, 2021 9:08pm
Your Due diligence blows!!! Park Energy Law is his LAW FIRM... where he is the managing partner. It is a completely seperate entity from RECO. Park Energy law is an LLP, Reco is a company, completely incompatible legal entities. And unless he was convicted, i really wouldn't believe the bribery charges.
Comment by
smilley69 on Mar 05, 2021 12:28am
I don't have a ton of shares but I'm in for under $1/share. I'm going to ride this to $0 or $20. There are are games being played and prices manipulated up and down. I'll just enjoy the show and enjoy. The only ones sweating this one are the day traders.
Comment by
ReConAfr on Mar 05, 2021 10:29am
UN Security Council made the bribery claims so I'm listening... https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-un-somalia-soma-idUKKCN0Q829Q20150804 FYI There is no ReCon in the UK, no company, and nobody by that name at the address...
Comment by
Fuqufrank on Mar 05, 2021 11:21am
Yes there is you numb-skull. https://reconafrica.com/contact/ They have a uk address you liar. Why are you lying? If he did bribe officials that is good news. A cutt-throat person is perfect for capitalistic endeavors.
Comment by
Crunch5555 on Mar 05, 2021 11:25am
Because as the English say ..the wanker is pumping his plays here and is probably short Reco.
Comment by
GorgeousGeorge1 on Mar 05, 2021 11:32am
I'm not commenting on this specific allegation. You should recognise though - this is not uncommon in Africa. Foreign execs are forced to grease palms if they want to operate there on any level. It's a very different landscape than nth America
Comment by
Chas15 on Mar 05, 2021 11:37am
The recent plummet in SP with no NR from the company is more concerning.
Comment by
GorgeousGeorge1 on Mar 05, 2021 11:56am
On a percentage basis it's performed about as poorly as Tesla over the last month, and I don't see any NR out of Tesla to soothe nerves. Speculative money is draining from these markets. RECO is only about halfway to TD, there is no leak
Comment by
Chas15 on Mar 05, 2021 12:05pm
It's okay, being emotionally attached to a stock is normal. It's definitely not good though. Lots of that here.
Comment by
GorgeousGeorge1 on Mar 05, 2021 12:08pm
Lol, and don't you love to stir it
Comment by
stiffupperlip on Mar 05, 2021 12:30pm
Agreed - when a highly speculative stock drops 50% and no NR that is a problem. It rattles to the core confidence in the company.
Comment by
Chas15 on Mar 05, 2021 12:40pm
I'm not asking for them to send a wellbore sample to my house lol but maybe a "we are 45 days behind because XYZ. Things are going according to plan" blah blah. And don't compare this to Tesla...ever. Lol.
Comment by
GorgeousGeorge1 on Mar 05, 2021 12:55pm
It's got more chance than outperforming the index than Tesla has from here, so I will compare them - on relative performance/alpha. It was intended for amusement. Lighten up
Comment by
Buyhigheatchips on Mar 05, 2021 3:14pm
It's not the company's job to hold our hands when there's some volatility. Maybe better off in GIC?
Comment by
Bpultra on Mar 05, 2021 7:47pm
Thanks for taking the time to post..... any idea of how many warrants are still outstanding ? ============
Comment by
teheran10 on Mar 06, 2021 4:41pm
.....you only have a few trading days to exercise your warrants, do you know that? at this point, meaning at this SP, the ones who held the warrants until now have made a huge mistake. Hopefully the SP bounces back to $4.50-$5 and you can exercise them. It may happend but you guys will have only 9 trading days for this to happen.
Comment by
WHVWHV on Mar 07, 2021 8:50pm
You are not telling me something I do not know. I have done it many times myself. That is by no means the only option. Several decades ago when I may not have known all the possibilities I may have asked the question but would not have told someone they were doing it wrong because I did not understand the possibilities.
Comment by
Crunch5555 on Mar 06, 2021 8:02pm
Retail investors without unlimited funds are the ones liquidating to exercise their warrants.Deep pockets kept their original holdings and exercised warrants..they want to have it all.Almost done with warrants ..was a gift to add or begin a new entry this last week.Onward and upward we go.
Comment by
hydrocarbss on Mar 06, 2021 11:12am
It's tough when one realizes a corporation is not being operated in a manner that supports one's psyche. It's possible times like these reveal what one is truly made of.
Comment by
TurnToTheRight on Mar 06, 2021 12:35am
2 problems with your statement: 1. Alleged, not proven, therefore did not occur for all intents and purposes 2. Jay was accused of having a conflict of interest, not a bribery charge. Please READ and use some LOGIC. What moron reads your article and gets that Jay was indicted for bribery. It says in plain english an alleged conflict of interest.