RE:What’s the point signing DA’s if they can’t generate any rev
Bash777 wrote: @Lordtunderin It’s not just millionbridges generating revenue @WealthAcquirer what about Thunes, Flutterwave, Alipay,(landmark) team worked tirelessly to get gone. Unionpay, Expedia, Bookings etc. What’s the point signing DA’s if they can’t generate any revenue. Those DA’s were signed months/years ago. I’m expecting more than just cost staying low. Really at this point it should be more with all those angles. No?
@PecanSandy04 Or a revenue update from latent partnerships. Something letting us know what some of those previous deals are doing.
Some good questions here. I've been saying for years that Steve is a one-trick pony. He only knows how to do one thing - more and more paperwork with no implementation. That's why all you ever see is more and more licenses, verticals, definitive agreements, and white labels with nothing ever implemented. Once he signs on the dotted line, he moves on to his next big idea that will never produce anything.
Unfortunately, this is all he will ever do. When he's in his manic phase and his narcissism reaches an all-time high, he will say things like he received 40 million EUR from Al-Fahim when in fact it was just a letter of intent, or Million Bridges will see billions of flow-through by the end of July, or an agreement with a top-four payment card issuer will be signed imminently, or that he will inform shareholders before the end of August about all the agreements he signed with prestigious bankers on Canary Wharf, but the reality is always much different.
I know it's pathetic, but that's the way it is and always will be with Steve and Revo.
Don't forget the famous "sandbox" uplisting they couldn't even qualify for. I wonder why that isn't talked about anymore?