Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Royal Helium Ltd V.RHC

Alternate Symbol(s):  V.RHC.W.A | RHCCF

Royal Helium Ltd. is a Canada-based company, which is focused on the exploration, production, and infrastructure with a primary focus on the development and production of helium and associated gases. The Company controls over 1,000,000 acres of prospective helium permits and leases across southern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta. Its helium reservoirs are carried primarily with nitrogen. Its helium lease/permit land is comprised of 10 main blocks spanning southwestern to southeastern Saskatchewan. Its exploration drilling at the Climax block in the southwest resulted in the discovery of the Climax Nazare zone. Its drilling in the southeastern side of the province has been initiated on the Ogema block. The Company’s properties are all in close vicinity to highways, roads, cities and oil & gas infrastructure. Its subsidiaries include Royal Helium Exploration Limited (RHEL) and Imperial Helium Corp (IHC).


TSXV:RHC - Post by User

Comment by Margin321on Sep 21, 2022 10:03am
124 Views
Post# 34976122

RE:RE:RE:RHC .C. Helium. News

RE:RE:RE:RHC .C. Helium. News Frostback: You write:  Please elaborate on the math used to determine what flow rate to expect at the well head.  Here is a small piece to get you started.

Gas well deliverability tests are used to predict the flow rate of a gas well during reservoir depletion (Canadian Energy Resources Conservation Board, 1975; Beggs, 1984; Ahmed, 2000; Lee, 2007). Measurements of reservoir pressures and their corresponding flow rates are obtained during the test and are subsequently analyzed. Selection of a deliverability test depends on the length of time needed to stabilize the rate of pressure decline. Pressure is stabilized when pressure fluctuations are minimized. An estimate of stabilization time is given by

(9.2.1)ts=1,000μre2kPr

where

ts = stabilization time (hr)

Pr = stabilized reservoir pressure (psia)

μ = gas viscosity at Pr (cp)

= porosity (fraction)

k = effective permeability (md)

re = outer radius of drainage area (ft)

Stabilized reservoir pressure Pr is obtained by shutting in the well until reservoir pressure stabilizes.

Single well gas deliverability tests include the conventional backpressure test, the isochronal test, and the modified isochronal test. Each flow rate for the conventional backpressure test should be maintained until the rate of pressure decline stabilizes. As reservoir permeability decreases, ts increases. The stabilization time for the backpressure test may be excessive for some reservoirs, such as low-permeability reservoirs. In this case, the isochronal test may be used. The isochronal test consists of several flow periods of equal duration. Each flow period begins at static reservoir conditions and uses a different flow rate. The final flow rate is maintained (or extended) until a stabilized pressure is reached.

Although the isochronal test is faster than the conventional backpressure test, production time is lost while the well is shut in until the reservoir returns to static conditions between each flow period. An alternative approach, which is faster but less accurate, is the modified isochronal test. In this case, the shut-in period is the same duration as the flow period, and unstabilized shut-in pressures must be used to evaluate test results.

The applicability of a Simplified Backpressure Analysis (SBA) or a Laminar-Inertial-Turbulent (LIT) analysis depends on the gas flow regime. Lee (2007) pointed out that the SBA method is valid at low pressures (<2,000 psia), while the LIT (pseudopressure) method is valid for all pressures.

9.2.1 The Simplified Backpressure Analysis Method

The backpressure equation is

(9.2.2)qsc=C(Pr2Pwf2)nC(ΔP2)n

where

C and n = empirical parameters

qsc = gas flow rate at standard conditions (MMSCFD)

Pr = stabilized reservoir pressure (psia)

Pwf = flowing wellbore pressure (psia)

Taking the logarithm of the backpressure equation for measurement i yields

(9.2.3)logqsci=nlog(ΔP2)i+logC

If we plot log qsci versus log(ΔP2)i, we obtain the equation for a straight line where n is the slope and log C is the intercept. The absolute open flow (AOF) of the well is the rate corresponding to Pwf = 0. Rates can be calculated from the backpressure equation using the values of C and n determined by a least squares fit of test data.

9.2.2 The Laminar-Inertial-Turbulent Method

The LIT method is applicable to any gas deliverability test. Test data are fit to the LIT equation

(9.2.4)m(Pr)m(Pwf)Δm=aqsc+bqsc2

where

qsc = gas flow rate at standard conditions (MMSCFD)

m(Pr) = pseudopressure corresponding to Pr (psia2/cp)

m(Pwf) = pseudopressure corresponding to Pwf (psia2/cp)

aqsc = laminar flow

bqsc = inertial and turbulent flow

The LIT equation is second order in rate. Dividing Eq. (9.2.4) for measurement i by qsci lets us write the LIT equation as

(9.2.5)Δmiqsci=bqsci+a

Plotting Δmi/qsci versus qsci gives a straight line with slope b and intercept a. Values of a and b can be determined by a least squares fit of test data, and flow rate can be calculated by solving Eq. (9.2.4) for qsc using the quadratic formula

(9.2.6)qsc=a+a2+4bΔm2b

Absolute open flow occurs when m(Pwf) = 0.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>