RE:RE:IR reply on new contracts and updatesIn fairness to mingzhu, my due diligence in the past has included a verification of one of his posts with Scott (Reliq investor relations). It was an exact quote. I have communicated regularly with Scott (and Lisa), and confirm that the writing style matches his messages. The content is accurate. I think mingzhu deserves more credit here.
itsbeenawhile10 wrote: Sorry mingzhu, in all due respect to my questions to you that I asked in the past for which you never replied to & just ignored & deflected from answering to in my opinion you show a lack of respect & credibility.
Thanks, but I never take for granted with what is written by an anonymous poster on a bullboard. Anybody can do a write up like you do & post it here or on any other bullboard for that matter, so I will wait for a press release from the company or other forms of dissemination to the public that the company can release in their MD&A & financial report or webinar or corporate presentation.
Always do your due diligence
mingzhu wrote:
See my responses below.
1. Since Reliq has not publicly disclosed numbers on the recent customers, I can not provide specifics due to selective disclosure regulations. What I can tell you is that these contract are expected to have patient numbers similar to other accounts. Based on previously stated Information the Medicare physician practices in Florida have over 500 Eligible Medicare patients per practice.
2. Chronic Care Management requires patients have 2 or more chronic conditions. Principle Care Management expands services to patients with only 1 chronic condition.
3. There has been no change to the previously disclosed schedule for Medtech Evolutions.
4. I expect there to be updates by Reliq between now and June 1st. I don’t have specifics. Reliq is conservative in what is considered Material as opposed to promotional.
I hope that answers your questions.
Best Regards,
Scott