RE:RE:RE:RE:IR reply - June 10 10amTeeswater, Scott is simply responding to investor questions posed by readers of themoneynarrative, which are forwarded to him by the publisher. The replies are being posted there, and links to some articles and comments that are of interest to this board are posted here. Note that Stockhouse readers occasionally cut and paste the responses here (after links to themoneynarrative's materials have been posted), and that other sites like CEO.CA sometimes pick up the stories (although links are never posted there by anyone connected in any way with themoneynarrative). Any reader can write to investor relations at RHT.V directly, but it sometimes takes a bit of time to get a response since they receive many messages every day. Themoneynarrative tends to get replies faster, since published questions and answers are of interest to many investors, meaning that the same or a similar answer doesn't have to be repeated as many times. That being said, themoneynarrative is not a conduit for messages to RHT.V, but does respond to their reader commentary, as needed.
teeswater wrote: Correct Iscfa. They might as well do a PP for a substantial amount and really get things moving. They are continuing to dilute anyways.
Would be nice if they would let shareholders know all the info Scott is putting out there to The Money Narrative in a webinar and answer our questions and concerns in one detailed webinar, in which questions could be asked. That being said, very happy that The MN shares with us all, so kudos to him.
On that note, what Scott is saying sounds like a positive, but we will see