RE:RE:RE:Question about the 550,000 possible on-boards by AutumnThe IR reply, as I expected, some people are always under the impression that the number in the pipeline = on-board numbers. THIS IS A READING COMPREHENSION ERROR.
The much needed question should be “*What is the status of onboards - did RHT begin to onboard?.
Takeactionnow wrote: Themoneynarrative came through with a fast answer from investor relations, which sheds some light on the issues:
RHT.V patient onboarding Takeactionnow wrote: I too can't see how possibly that many people could be onboarded by then. What seems to make more sense is to have clients signed who have that many patients who
are to be onboarded. Since this is really a critical question, I am going to ask themoneynarrative to reach out to RHT.V investor relations for clarification. They seem to get answers pretty quickly.
teeswater wrote: As one poster stated on this board in the last few weeks, we should only expect a fraction of this number to be onboarded by late 2020 if we are being realistic.
I am just wondering why the Co. would put out a statement like that if investors are supposed to expect much less?