RE:RE:Both Digitel & Investor22 is correct on the same level Let's not forget that clients
do have a financial incentive to onboard, which supports Reliq's statements that the pandemic has been a leading cause of the slower than expected progress.
theinvestor22 wrote: A very good posting. Since the clients are responsible for onboarding, I do think we'll have to wait to see just how much of it actually happens.
If contracts
required clients to onboard, then the signing of a contract would really mean something and that something could be called success. But that's not the case here.
I agree that one must invest without having conclusive evidence of success, but having done so on limited info doesn't make the company or your investment successful.
I like the prospects here and I'll consider RHT a success when the results warrant it.
Aei773ou wrote: Hey guys this is a card game.
We have some very good cards to start off - the big contracts in Florida & Louisiana and numerous small contracts in Texas. Digitel thinks he has already a very successful hand to win and Investor22 thinks that too but reserve to call a winner because he wants to be sure got hit with some more good cards.
The trouble is that the missing cards will come late as the dealer has been hospitalized because of Covid 19. The game can only resume until he is back to his job.