Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT

Monthly, schmonthly

[lscfa]

Beware of third-party vendors who promise significant revenue from CCM, warns Ross. “Instead, what makes sense is finding a third party partner who helps you more effectively reach and manage patients that demand a lot of your resources and staff time-and who can help you cut your CCM management costs.”

Nor should practices equate outsource value with how many of their patients the vendor can call every month. When River Bend Medical Associates, a family practice in Sacramento, Calif., began its CCM program in 2015, it started small, targeting about 100 of its sickest, highest-need patients, and sought an outside vendor that aligned with that approach and would assist, rather than run, its program.

But most of the companies the practice approached wanted to take over the program, take 50 percent of River Bend’s CCM reimbursements “and just hit as many of our patients each month as possible,” recalls Francisco Garcia, MD, the practice’s leader. Instead, River Bend hired a vendor who charges much less and risk-stratified patients by acuity levels, with highest-acuity patients getting at least one call each month and those with lowest acuity getting quarterly calls.

https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/how-deliver-effective-and-profitable-chronic-care-management

[TicTacTo]

use Reliq and do not pay them, the cheapest option as unable to collect money

[Aei773ou]

There is no issue (yet) with RHT and their third party partners because as I recall the iUGO services are free during the pandemic, as disclosed by management earlier in the summer. So I am lost why some still think there will be revenues from SaaS this calendar year. Management has not mentioned of a reversal in this charity like policy.