Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

RESERVOIR MINERALS INC V.RMC

"Reservoir Minerals Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Serbia, Cameroon, Gabon, Macedonia and Romania."


TSXV:RMC - Post by User

Post by thorgb1on Jun 03, 2016 11:03am
131 Views
Post# 24931187

I'm voting NO

I'm voting NOUltimately, my decision is based on what is best for the share price, and I just feel that we have a better chance of seeing $15-20 bucks if we move forward as a standalone entity. I think now that we have exercised the ROFO and have acquired outright ownership of ~80% of the asset, we may see new suitors emerge as well given that the time constraints have been lifted, and wouldn't it be great to see some value for the porphyry factored into an acquisition. I see no real downside either way for RMC shareholders, but as I see it there is alot more upside at this point if we vote no to the NSU deal. GLTA.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>