RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NCIB and CMTS sford - Thank you and you're absolutely correct! ROI has 40 million (or so) fewer shares out.
To reiterate the point :
From over here it appears that everyone except the math-elites runnning these ROI share buy-back schemes is aware that 400 million shares at $0.25 is a lot more valuable than 360 million shares at $0.02.
In fact, the argument for shrinking the float without sustainable material sales support is a well proven (and often fatal) business mistake. So why ROI knowingly devalues itself this way is the messed up mystery. (Consolidation threats that'll wipe out shareholders is another very serious s/p devaluator but that's another topic...)
Also
sford - Do you mean to say that ROI always had extra cash around to grow the enterprise and just didn't bother? - ... really? (if true at least that'd explain the dirth of on-board Harvard business school grads :)
Finally.
Being woke is good. Moving regular material sales successes out of the wishful thinking TBA columns of the ADX or the Farmer's Almanac or whoever your favorite futurist is and instead- reporting real sales in the real world would be a nice cool change too.
dyodd
knowsjack