Post by
diabase1 on Nov 21, 2022 11:04am
Blakelock3
There was no iron formation intercepted within the 2 drill holes put down by TGS. And there was only 4" of magnetite in DDH 2. So the magnetic feature is clearly related to pyrrhotite (which is good for gold).
Traces of chalcopyrite were intercepted in DDH 2, but there may have been more copper, if the conductor was drilled in the right direction.
Could the bluish mica in TGS DDH 1 be corderite or grunerite?
Could the melanocratic granite be gabbro?
The conductor approx 700m to the west of the property doesn't have any magnetic correlation, so no pyrrhotite likely, as most other conductors in the area have.