Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Southern Arc Minerals Inc V.SA.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  SARMF

Southern Arc Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based company. The Company is primarily engaged in the project generation and investments in mineral resource companies with a focus on gold and copper-gold. The Company operates through the acquisition and exploration of resource properties and investments segment. The Company has not generated any revenue.


TSXV:SA.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by buyb4its2l82on Mar 28, 2014 6:05pm
206 Views
Post# 22384215

SA moving the cash to EAG is a good idea

SA moving the cash to EAG is a good ideaRestrictions on foreign mining investors are getting complicated. At least if you can't sell everything then move what you can now. SA is thinking and EAG is looking better all the time. Cheers.

Tighter foreign ownership restrictions for exploration

and producing mines
 

The industry expectation was that Reg 27/2013 would lay out the remaining

details of how the 51% divestment arrangement would be implemented.

However, Reg 27/2013 introduces an additional foreign investment regime

which further restricts the ability of foreigners to maintain their shareholdings

in IUP companies.

The new restrictions introduced are triggered when either:

 a non-foreign investment (non-PMA) IUP company is first converted to

PMA (i.e., when a foreign investor acquires any shares in that IUP

company for the first time); or

 there is a change in the shareholding in an existing PMA IUP company.

The new foreign ownership limitations that are triggered in such

circumstances are:

 foreign ownership in companies holding Exploration IUPs is limited to 75%;

and

 foreign ownership in companies holding Production Operation IUPs is

limited to 49%.

The effect of these new requirements is to introduce a faster divestment

requirement than previously existed.

For example, if an existing IUP company

has an Exploration IUP and 80% foreign ownership and the foreign

shareholder wishes to sell out to another foreign owner, the maximum foreign

ownership would become 75% and the extra 5% would need to be sold to

Indonesians. Similarly, the maximum foreign ownership that an incoming

foreign investor would be able to obtain in an IUP company holding a

Production Operation IUP would immediately be limited to 49%.

Aside from the obvious commercial impact, this also has ramifications for

dilution under shareholders agreements and enforcement of pledges over

shares.

Bullboard Posts