Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Sirona Biochem Corp V.SBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  SRBCF

Sirona Biochem Corp. is a cosmetic ingredient and drug discovery company with proprietary platform developed at its laboratory facility in France. Through its wholly owned subsidiary TFChem S.A.R.L., the Company specializes in stabilizing carbohydrate molecules. The principal activities of the Company include development of cosmetic and pharmaceutical active ingredients. TFChem develops and markets its GlycoMim technology for pharmaceutical and biotechnology comp anies. TFChem’s proprietary chemistry technology can be applied to the development of several pharmaceutical domains such as cancer, diabetes, pain and inflammation and cardio-vascular diseases. Its cosmetic therapeutic area includes skincare-dark spot corrector (Rx & OTC), cell preservation and repair (including keloid and scar therapy), skincare-anti aging/anti-wrinkle and skincare-cellulite treatment. It has developed an active ingredient, TFC-1067 for the treatment of Dyschromia (Dark spots on the skin).


TSXV:SBM - Post by User

Comment by Pandoraon Jan 26, 2024 9:51pm
71 Views
Post# 35848217

RE:GREAT NEWS!!!! ANOTHER 'PRIVATE' PLACEMENT

RE:GREAT NEWS!!!! ANOTHER 'PRIVATE' PLACEMENT
"general working capital purposes."

What is the most common breakdown of this statement? Is it usually or not the payment of executive salaries. Should it not have a more explicit broader scope?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>