RE:RE:RE:Update Looking4
You missed the whole point of my post which comes from blind love of a stock by a retail investor! Take the blinders off and read what i said. It is not negative but rather inconclusive. In other words alot of unknows! I will use your example and then apply it to my post. So you say 100m at .82 is pretty good. Now if you read my post you will note I point out 2 things you need to apply to that hole result! First what is the true width of the drill result. Well they do not know! Deposits are not linear! So if the true width is only 60% then you have to remove 40% of the gold when doing a hole calculation. The other big thing is of course how much earth do you have to remove to get to the gold. Now if that 100m at .82 was located from surface to 150 metres that would be great! It is not! It is located 156m to 257m... Actual grade from 65m on is only .61 which means you have to mine gold that is less than .4 gpt for 156meter before you start mining .82 grade. Like I said does not look like a bad bet around these levels but you should understand what you are doing! It kills me how many people on these boards like to call down or call people bashers for pointing out the good with the bad! And when you insult people and tell them to leave a board that is not chealeading but rather ignorant and stupidity!