Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

San Lorenzo Gold Corp V.SLG.RT


Primary Symbol: V.SLG Alternate Symbol(s):  SNLGF

San Lorenzo Gold Corp. is a Canada-based company engaged in the business of exploring for and advancing mineral properties. The Company is focused on exploring for gold, copper, silver, and cobalt. The Company has three 100% owned properties in Chile: Salvadora, Nancagua and Punta Alta. The Salvadora property is being explored for large scale copper-gold porphyry targets and high-grade epithermal gold-silver-copper vein systems. The Salvadora Project consists of about 25 exploration concessions and nine exploitation concessions totaling 8,796 hectares (ha). Nancagua is a high grade mesothermal gold-silver prospect and has six linear kilometers (km) of veins. The Nancagua Property is located approximately 120 km south of Santiago, Chile. Punta Alta is an IOCG prospect with related disseminated and vein style high grade copper-gold-silver-cobalt mineralization. The Punta Alta property consists of seven exploration concessions totaling approximately 2,000 ha.


TSXV:SLG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by triumph1973on May 17, 2013 10:41am
213 Views
Post# 21408800

RE: RE: RE: support by major shareholders

RE: RE: RE: support by major shareholders

Honestly you wanted to be taken out at  .85 cents ??? Would it not be better to stick with this until the first gas at Breagh and then decide what to do. They managed to qualify for the bond and you know that the DD that was done to get 200 million at that time must have been rigorous. I think that investors are missing the boat on this one I have traded this company since 2006 and followed intently as it has developed. Yes mistakes were made and yes it would have been nice if everything went to plan but how often does that happen.

Those who follow this know that the stock price was initially hammered as a result of the Romanian government trying to pull a fast one and denying their licenses. Followed buy the beginning of the delays at Breagh. Followed by the failed capital raise at ridiculously low share price. Romania was dealt with to share holders benefit no rally, Breagh seems to be in the home stretch no rally, and they rightfully pulled the share offering that would have been dilutive to us all.

Today, trading well below net asset value and about to start collecting revenue from long over due Breagh field, no longer on the edge of financial collapse by way of short term bond issue. I have a interest in this so I am not without bias but how can it be better to be taken out at .85 cents?

One more thing, the share holders have already paid for Mike Azancot to learn the lessons that admittedly he should have learned before being in the position that he is in. Unfortunately, he did not foresee the lack of preparation on shore at the processing plant that was to take the gas from Breagh. Should we not stick around to see the benefit of a CEO lead his company with the knowledge we purchased? 

Just saying!

 

Bullboard Posts